Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
Project

Phomopsis viticola, pathogenicity and management

This page contains information about our current research projects and programs, reports from our completed projects, and tells you how to access our funding and report back to us if you are funded. Browse the listing or search for particular topics.

Application of fungicides is not warranted for Type 1 now known as Diaporthe.

Abstract

In Australia, the fungi Phomopsis type 1 and type 2 are associated with Phomopsis cane and leaf spot on grapevine. Currently, fungicides are applied to control the disease but these may be unwarranted if vineyards are infected solely by type 1. Experiments were conducted in the glasshouse and at four vineyards, in the Adelaide Hills and Southern Fleurieu Peninsula, SA to assess the effect of type 1 on grapevine. It was shown that Phomopsis type 1 did not cause injury to vines and is not associated with bud loss. It is recommended that the application of fungicides is not warranted for the control of type 1. To eliminate confusion between Phomopsis type 1 and type 2, the term Diaporthe should be used for type 1 as it does not cause disease.

Downloads

Member content

This content is restricted to wine exporters and levy payers.

Reports are also available for one-off purchase to non-members.

Click here to find out more.