Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
Project

Ensuring the continued efficacy of Brettanomyces control strategies for avoidance of spoilage

Ensuring the continued efficacy of Brettanomyces control strategies for avoidance of spoilage

Final Report
Download
PDF 2.2MB

Spoilage of wine by Brettanomyces yeasts remains one of the foremost microbiological problems faced by winemakers. The risk of ‘Brett’ spoilage is currently managed through application of a multi-faceted strategy previously developed by the AWRI in collaboration with Australian winemakers, which facilitated industry-wide decreases in levels of spoilage compounds in finished wines. This strategy does not, however, eliminate Brettanomyces yeasts from wineries, and is heavily reliant upon use of the preservative sulfite to stabilise wine against Brettanomyces growth. To ensure Australian winemakers’ continued ability to manage ‘Brett’ in a cost-effective manner, this project examined the interactions of sulfite with Brettanomyces biology at the population, strain and molecular levels.

Contrary to work done elsewhere, this project did not find evidence that Brettanomyces cells enter a viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state in response to sulfite. Exhaustive, long-term experiments instead suggest that resumption of population growth is dependent upon low numbers of viable, culturable cells, that may fall below limits of detection for standard microbiological and rapid tests.

For the first time, laboratory experiments revealed potential for common Australian winery strains of Brettanomyces bruxellensis to evolve greater tolerance to sulfite. Strikingly, when new industry isolates were obtained and compared to strains isolated over the past two decades it was evident that selection for sulfite-tolerance is already occurring. Attempts to characterise the mechanisms by which B. bruxellensis gains tolerance to sulfite did not reveal a common pattern, though parallel work showed that variations in amino acid sequence of the sulfite efflux pump Ssu1p can partly explain strain variation.

Efforts to identify genetic determinants of sulfite tolerance were hampered by the lack of molecular genetics tools for Brettanomyces yeasts. In response to this limitation, new tools were developed for the genetic transformation of B. bruxellensis, which were applied to study competitiveness of different strains under sulfite stress. The importance of developing tools for further study of Brettanomyces biology was emphasised by observed strain-level variation in efficacy of an increasingly popular alternative control agent, chitosan, which was shown to be ineffective against a key Australian wine strain.

Abstract

Spoilage of wine by Brettanomyces yeasts remains one of the foremost microbiological problems faced by winemakers. Current strategies to minimise risk of spoilage do not eliminate Brettanomyces yeasts from wineries and are heavily reliant upon use of the preservative sulfite to stabilise wine against Brettanomyces growth. This project demonstrated that existing Brettanomyces wine strains have potential to evolve greater tolerance to sulfite and found evidence for this occurring in industry. The importance of developing new research tools for these yeasts was underscored by observed variation in efficacy of an emerging sulfite alternative, chitosan, which was ineffective against some strains.

Objectives

  • Identify the risk that the spoilage yeast, Brettanomyces, will become sulfite resistant
  • Identify the best way to detect Brettanomyces
  • Develop alternative Brettanomyces control strategies

Background

Brettanomyces can be managed but has not been eliminated from Australian wineries, and loss of value still occurs. A weak point in many Brettanomyces control strategy implementations is a lack of appropriate monitoring tools. Plating methods are laborious and slow, and some rapid methods infer the existence of viable but nonculturable (VBNC) populations that, under certain conditions, may resume growth and spoil the wine. If these VBNC yeast are in fact dead, risk adverse winemakers may be conducting costly and unnecessary processing. If VBNC Brettanomyces do exist, then plating methods will likely underestimate the risk.

Brettanomyces is currently managed with sulfite, but there is increasing pressure to minimise the levels of sulfite in wine. Exposure to sub-lethal dosages creates a situation analogous to that which causes antibiotic resistance in infectious pathogens and may lead to emergence of more sulfite tolerant Brettanomyces strains.

Approach

The existence of VBNC populations present in the wine will be determined. The project team has several strategies to improve diagnostic tools and/or interpretation of the results, dependent on whether VBNC status is confirmed or not.

The risk of emergence of sulfite-resistant strain will be evaluated using genomic approaches. After sulfite resistance has been shown to be a real threat, molecular tools will be developed for monitoring in the field, and alternative strategies to control Brett will be developed and evaluated.

Sector benefits

This project will generate knowledge that will allow winemakers to better manage and reduce the risk of Brettanomyces spoilage.

Member content

This content is restricted to wine exporters and levy payers.

Reports are also available for one-off purchase to non-members.

Click here to find out more.